Sunday, February 26, 2012

Bartleby

     Bartleby is a representation of a new consumer or leisure class. He presents a lax attitude towards work, in contrast to the narrator who clearly embodies the Protestant Ethic of work and charity. Through these characters, Melville shows the deterioration of society, as this new class has no respect for the old ways.

     Bartleby is a very eccentric man who comes to work as a copier at the law office.  Bartleby is paid 4 cents per 100 words that he copies. There are 2 other men who work as copiers and a young man who works as an errand boy of sorts. The 3 other men in the office copy, but also do other tasks asked of them by the lawyer like edit and run errands. Bartleby refuses to do any other duties besides copy, he always just replies "I'd prefer not to".

     In the begining Bartleby copies day and night, producing great output. "At first Bartleby did an extraordinary quantity of writing. As if long famishing for something to copy, he seemed to gorge himself on my documents. There was no pause for digestion. He ran a day and night line, copying by sun-light and by candle-light. I should have been quite delighted with his application, had be been cheerfully industrious. But he wrote on silently, palely, mechanically." (par 18 Melville)

     As the story goes on, Bartleby is willing to do less and less until he finally is willing to do nothing at all. Not only was Bartleby doing less and less work, he also became somewhat rude as time went on. He would not acknowledge or answer when he was called upon until he had been called upon several times. "
 “Bartleby! quick, I am waiting.”  27
  I heard a slow scrape of his chair legs on the uncarpeted floor, and soon he appeared standing at the entrance of his hermitage.  28
  “What is wanted?” said he mildly.  29
  “The copies, the copies,” said I hurriedly. “We are going to examine them. There”—and I held towards him the fourth quadruplicate.  30
  “I would prefer not to,” he said, and gently disappeared behind the screen.
(par 27-30 Melville)

     The lawyer would go to the other 3 men/employees and ask them what they thought of Bartleby's behavior and they hated his attitude and wanted him to change and be willing to do the work they were doing also, they thought he was crazy, and they thought he should be fired. “I think I should kick him out of the office.” (par 44 Melville)  “I think, sir, he’s a little luny” (par 47 Melville).

     Bartleby seemed to have taken advantage of everything he could. He lived in the office for free, did the absolute bare minimum amount of work he could, and refused to talk to any of the employees. Clearly though he wasn't a bad person acting this way on purpose to be mean. It seems as though there was something mentally wrong with guy. He seemed to have no social skills at all and maybe had other issues. I know in the average workplace he would have been fired but the lawyer felt some sort of compassion for this guy. He felt sorry for him and was afraid that if he fired Bartleby, Bartleby would have to work somewhere else and the new employer would have been mean to him so he kept him around so he wouldn't be hurt by someone else. "If I turn him away, the chances are he will fall in with some less indulgent employer, and then he will be rudely treated, and perhaps driven forth miserably to starve." (par 53 Meliville)  The lawyer did this until he just could no longer do it, then when he tried to get rid of him, he wouldn't leave. 

     I have read about this story on a few websites just to try and get a better understanding of what is going on and they all have stated that there are many takes on it. Different ways one can perceive what Melville's reasoning was behind this story. I really am unsure. I feel like he is writing a tale of a man who is just a bit odd and got lucky to have gotten a job at this lawyers office where he was tollerated and they tried to figure him out.



Works Cited: Melville, Herman. "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-street." 1853. 


Sunday, February 12, 2012

Summary vs. Analysis

     Summary is just a recap of what you have just read, watched, saw, etc. Summary is "to make a 

long  

story short". In a summary there is no drama or action, just a quick description of the story to let the 

person you are summarizing to get the gist or idea. 
    
     Analysis is more of a critique. If I saw a movie and wanted my friend to see the movie I would 

give a short summary and then put my opinion of the movie in, maybe I saw past the obvious plot 

and 

saw a deeper, hidden meaning. For example: The Cinderella story in our tutorial. Cinderella seems to 

be a sad

and tragic story that has a turn for the better and ends "happily ever after" but some see the story as

the male dominated world keeping the women down. That right there is analysis and not summary. 

image from: Josh Hedges/Zuffa LLC - Zuffa LLC via Getty Images
      
I think of how we can summarize the fight but most people analyze the fight. If you see chat rooms or 
listen to friends talking after a fight you get a lot of opinion and what "they" think really happened.


Please see the video below for help on the Summary vs. Analysis subject.










Sunday, February 5, 2012

A Modest Proposal by Dr. Jonathan Swift

     Swift is writing about the poverty in Ireland during his time. The poor breeding poor who then become thieves or move away from their country.
     His solution is to sell infants of the poor to the rich. The meat of the infants will be eaten as delicacy and skin to be used as gloves and boots.
     I think he wrote this to wake the people of his country up, shock value of sorts. The people lived like this for so long it was just normal for them so this is his way of saying "HELLO", "WAKE UP PEOPLE", "WE NEED TO MAKE SOME CHANGES".
     Part of the reason he wrote this the way he did is due to the terrible treatment of the Irish by the English. He stated that the landlords have already devoured the parents...like they ate the parents up. I'm wondering if this treatment and thinking of it in that way is what gave him the whole idea of selling babies as food in the first place.
     Although his idea is shocking and crazy and he definitely is not serious that we should be selling and eating children, it is logical in that he thought out every detail of all his societies problems and how this would help. There wouldn't be so many poor everywhere, they would be fed and clothed and living better, no more abortion, men wouldn't beat their women (at least while they were pregnant), and many, many, more reasons.

image from: http://stuntgranny.com/2011/11/28/dustys-blog-a-modest-proposal-for-changing-the-shape-of-wwe/875893546094693804&page=1&tbnh=126&tbnw=101&start=0&







Some interesting info on  Dr. Jonathan Swift: http://www.victorianweb.org/previctorian/swift/bio.html

Sunday, January 29, 2012

good readers

     Nabokov believes a good reader is one who has imagination, memory, a dictionary and some artistic sense. He says we need to be "rereaders". Read the book once and then go back and read it again at least once more. When we reread, we are able to acquaint ourselves with the book and can take in the whole picture and enjoy the details. A good reader will use "impersonal imagination" and "artistic delight", an "artistic harmonious balance between the reader's mind and the authors mind."
     I do agree that having a good imagination makes reading more enjoyable and a dictionary is a must. I understand how rereading a book will make it more clear and you will find things you didn't the first time around but I have not read a book more than once.
     I think a good reader is someone who is open minded and is accepting of other peoples opinions, that is how we learn new things and new ways of seeing things/new points of view.
     I think I am a good reader when I am reading a subject that I like but when I read something that I am not interested in I have a hard time caring about it enough to really pay good attention to it, so in those instances I am not a good reader.

 image citation: http://www.medea.provincia.venezia.it/gab/nafisi/nafisi_2.htm

link: http://www.sightwordsgame.com/learning-to-read/seven-habits-of-a-good-reader/







intro video





http://youtu.be/JOg9Nk3AFtk